Larry Elliott rightly sees the current panic about a “black hole” in public funding as demonstrating a fundamental misunderstanding of public economics (The UK economy is about to be thrown into a black hole – by its own government, 2 November). As he points out, the widespread use of state money creation (quantitative easing) after the financial crisis of 2007-08 and the Covid pandemic fundamentally challenges the fairytale that the public sector is totally dependent on private funding. QE also challenges the assumption that public “money printing” automatically leads to inflation. The current inflationary spike comes from non-monetary factors: the war in Ukraine and the Covid slowdown. The problem with Trussonomics was that it looked to the wrong agent of growth: trickle-down from the rich, rather than public investment. If there is a black hole that sucks in all the monetary energy, it is the gross accumulation of private wealth in fewer and fewer hands while public services are run down and more families are forced on to the breadline. An economics for the 21st century must thrust aside the ideological strictures of neoliberalism and develop the use of public money for the public good. Prof Mary Mellor Newcastle upon Tyne • What a relief to read Larry Elliott’s article and your Bank of England editorial (2 November) showing that at least some people in the media are not, as John Keynes put it, “slaves of some defunct economist” or economic theory. There is indeed no black hole in the country’s economy requiring more austerity and tax rises. There is, however, a social and environmental hole in the economic solutions parroted endlessly by the rest of the media. As Elliott and your editorial showed, the Bank needs to stop putting up interest rates and instead reintroduce a massive QE programme, which predominantly funded the government deficits following the banking and Covid crises. With an eye on the next election, it’s time the opposition parties started to make this funding case. The next time they grill Rishi Sunak or Jeremy Hunt, they should demand that they explain exactly where the roughly £400bn injected into the economy during the Covid era came from, and whether it involved us being beholden to bondholders or being funded by huge tax increases. The answers to which are QE, no and no. Colin Hines Convener, UK Green New Deal Group • Larry Elliott comprehensively exposes the ludicrous strategies of the Tory government and the Bank of England. But the fact that they have pursued apparent illogicality for 12 years has got nothing to do with economics. It makes ever more clear that the aim is to dismantle our common weal – and the result is social murder. While cruelty, incompetence and corruption have become the trademarks of the party in power, there is a darker motivation than merely enriching themselves and their friends. Kevin Donovan Birkenhead, Merseyside • I absolutely agree with Larry Elliott’s article, but the elephant in the room is always Brexit. To quote a tweet by the economist Prof Danny Blanchflower a few months ago: “Brexit is the main explanation as to why the economic situation in the UK is much worse than anywhere else and set to get even worse both absolutely and relatively made worse by the inflationists.” Patricia Borlenghi Manningtree, Essex • Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.